Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:15:45 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st> To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removing documentation Message-ID: <56B91391.8050605@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20160208220731.GH71035@eureka.lemis.com> References: <56B752FD.6000906@marino.st> <20160208134044.GA7839@lonesome.com> <56B89C6F.2010800@marino.st> <20160208220731.GH71035@eureka.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/8/2016 11:07 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I think you're missing the point. If this were the criterion for > becoming maintainer, there's a good chance that nobody would > volunteer. Your suggestion would work in a corporate environment, but > that's not us. I have said repeatedly that this criteria is unique to portmaster due to it's presence in the handbook and to its [apparent] importance in the ports ecosystem. I am NOT saying this is the criteria for every port. However, I would rather nobody volunteer if they aren't qualified so that decisions aren't kicked down the road like a can. I'm not looking to check a box resulting in no improvement, I want somebody qualified or not at all.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56B91391.8050605>