From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 24 05:24:20 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D88CC37B401; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (esplanaden.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.114])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A26943FAF; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3OCOGRi002050;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:12:06 PDT."
             <200304241212.h3OCC6Ej048588@repoman.freebsd.org> 
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:24:16 +0200
Message-ID: <2049.1051187056@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_proc.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:24:21 -0000

In message <200304241212.h3OCC6Ej048588@repoman.freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgr
av writes:
>des         2003/04/24 05:12:06 PDT
>
>  FreeBSD src repository
>
>  Modified files:
>    sys/kern             kern_proc.c 
>  Log:
>  It seems that 1 was not a magic value as I thought, but a coincidence.
>  Instead of applying the adjustment to processes with a start time of 1,
>  apply it to all processes with a start time of less than 3600.
>  
>  None of this would be necessary if the start times were recorded in ticks
>  instead of seconds and microseconds.

The correct solution is to record the start time as "uptime" and add
"boottime" to that value before presentation.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.