Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:58:16 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Cc: beyssac@enst.fr, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Message-ID: <28858.942818296@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:41:32 %2B0900." <19991117134132S.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19991117134132S.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>, Yoshinobu Inoue writes: >solution: > Don't specify addresses via jail(2), and let kernel select > any non binded address. No, that doesn't work. People want to run servers so they want to know their IP for DNS. >A weak point of this solution is that processes in a same jail >won't be necessariliy binded to a same address, but does it >matters? Yes, that also matters, this is a administrative facility. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28858.942818296>