From owner-freebsd-small Sat Jan 29 19:55: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from nfs1-1.bctel.ca (nfs1-1.bctel.ca [207.194.28.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6415E150A0 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:54:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stainsby@telus.net) Received: from ws1 (vanc06m06-198.bctel.ca [207.194.25.198]) by nfs1-1.bctel.ca (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA10020; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:54:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000b01bf6ad5$f157baa0$c619c2cf@ws1> From: "Erik Stainsby" To: "Greg Lehey" , "Andrzej Bialecki" Cc: "Michael Larsen" , "Roger Hardiman" , Subject: Re: PicoBSD changes for 4.0-current Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:56:07 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Given the recent discussion about maintainers in general, I think we >should only have maintainers for those products where one person does >the bulk (> 75%) of the work. I don't think PicoBSD fits into this >category, so I'd suggest that we don't have a maintainer. > >Greg >-- >Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key >See complete headers for address and phone numbers Fair enough, perhaps but the gist of the question still ought to be addressed, don't you think? Idem est, who should be the agent/rep for posting changes into the tree ? Erik Stainsby stainsby@telus.net ========================================================== There was no year zero. Consider this simple chart: Decade: 1 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 30 Century: 1 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 Millennium: 1 - 1000 1001 - 2000 2001 - 3000 The third millennium begins January 1, 2001 ========================================================== E Pluribus Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message