Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 06:55:20 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl>, Brian Tao <taob@io.org> Cc: bugs@ns1.win.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Guido's pwd_mkdb improvements (fwd) Message-ID: <pZeWYPmCoJ@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199509241950.UAA06285@gvr.win.tue.nl>; from Guido van Rooij at Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:50:19 %2B0100 (MET) References: <199509241950.UAA06285@gvr.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199509241950.UAA06285@gvr.win.tue.nl> Guido van Rooij
writes:
>A simple observation: most master.passwd updates are done because
>only one line needs to be updated. So I added an option to
>pwd_mkdb that only touches a specific record.
Does it handle in right way users with different names but the same uid?
I remember 1.x one-record-update version update only first one
in this case... I.e. how store-by-uid works in this case?
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?pZeWYPmCoJ>