From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 06:11:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D17716A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from solskogen@carebears.mine.nu) Received: from mail.hjemme.no (mail.hjemme.no [62.97.193.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4739F43D53 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from solskogen@carebears.mine.nu) Received: from carebears.mine.nu (151.85-200-10.bkkb.no [85.200.10.151]) by mail.hjemme.no (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1F6BM0a002018; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:23 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carebears.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10555CD70A; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from carebears.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shine.carebears.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02550-07; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from carebears.mine.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carebears.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE6FCD709; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from 62.97.242.158 (SquirrelMail authenticated user solskogen) by carebears.mine.nu with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1190.62.97.242.158.1139983874.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <219837f70602141819l7a95d818h55235eb6843352ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <43F26E3F.8050201@yahoo.com> <200602150003.k1F03cED001106@barriere241.nike.com> <219837f70602141819l7a95d818h55235eb6843352ae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:14 +0100 (CET) From: "Christer Solskogen" To: "Sam Sutch" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at carebears.mine.nu Cc: Ronny Hippler , chat@freebsd.org, "Hamell, Rick \(ACS\)" Subject: Re: Reason #328 why I love FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:11:27 -0000 On Wed, February 15, 2006 03:19, Sam Sutch wrote: > No, and I'm not aware why anyone would use FAT anymore in the first > place. NTFS negates the problems one might have with FAT tables and a > quick format is suffecient for any Windows install. Also, NTFS can > install on a fresh drive without any partition tables. > FAT is the only way to exchange data from one OS to an other when running dual-boot. NTFS-write from FreeBSD (nor Linux) is no good! -- cso