Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:11:14 +0100 (CET) From: "Christer Solskogen" <solskogen@carebears.mine.nu> To: "Sam Sutch" <samuraiblog@gmail.com> Cc: Ronny Hippler <r11roadster@yahoo.com>, chat@freebsd.org, "Hamell, Rick \(ACS\)" <rick.hamell@nike.com> Subject: Re: Reason #328 why I love FreeBSD... Message-ID: <1190.62.97.242.158.1139983874.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <219837f70602141819l7a95d818h55235eb6843352ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <43F26E3F.8050201@yahoo.com> <200602150003.k1F03cED001106@barriere241.nike.com> <219837f70602141819l7a95d818h55235eb6843352ae@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, February 15, 2006 03:19, Sam Sutch wrote: > No, and I'm not aware why anyone would use FAT anymore in the first > place. NTFS negates the problems one might have with FAT tables and a > quick format is suffecient for any Windows install. Also, NTFS can > install on a fresh drive without any partition tables. > FAT is the only way to exchange data from one OS to an other when running dual-boot. NTFS-write from FreeBSD (nor Linux) is no good! -- cso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1190.62.97.242.158.1139983874.squirrel>