From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sat May 6 19:26:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE02ED61DC3; Sat, 6 May 2017 19:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49F5336; Sat, 6 May 2017 19:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id D052A7844; Sat, 6 May 2017 19:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 21:26:39 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r317886 - in head: lib/libstand sys/boot/common sys/boot/i386/libi386 Message-ID: <20170506192639.fgnk3icvlseucjdt@ivaldir.net> References: <201705061923.v46JNwvG011568@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qu4vzv4jzzbsmmw6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201705061923.v46JNwvG011568@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 19:26:51 -0000 --qu4vzv4jzzbsmmw6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:23:58PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Sat May 6 19:23:58 2017 > New Revision: 317886 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317886 >=20 > Log: > distinguish NFS versus TFTP boot by rootpath > =20 > Don't use DHCP 150 option to decide which protocol use to netboot. When > root-path includes ip address - go thru NFS, if ip address not exists in > root-path - go thru TFTP from server which ip address is in next-server= =2E But > there is one limitation - only one tftp server in network to provide lo= ader and > everything else. Does enybody use more than only one? > =20 > Submitted by: kczekirda > Sponsored by: Oktawave > MFC after: 3 weeks > Relnote: Yes > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8740 Sorry I meant: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10603 Best regards, Bapt --qu4vzv4jzzbsmmw6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAlkOI2AACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plo3ORAA1BcegBekdkJXrCRuiX3/dniaXXyV8lvxJS/MWe1ki6gilrhm0+TnQrHY L/wgxr7BVsssiNlKNerD1bO/uxJbEf3BcTEoqhhLZxf30Gs2KH0xJ18z3jhkeMwb 5mIuH+fQa4Twbkc9tH7EMq/SpYWjqqlYfqQ2GzPf54Hfcms+nat+OybFPeQqEhcv Waqp8C5bbmwb14DpRXzw5wWJnalV1X6NoeZihpQBIvh8r4GMFoKd5Dc+qQYSWoDu i7ttQY7kXXIUt+1su6ersSzTYqMSBDV5WG0szHFRfEH5Ve5x7VMTvIZ5WBiziq0F xoBYkaTQc6FK4CCEYT7D5BsMQJR+J800f1hzAvAdrZgNXoDiiaBX6MsqbDYXo5k/ Rw1lcBzPz7j0LOXgLStETPDoIWHkmvCQmqzpzLefJWqSwM8tKVLVI8S9fevi6vl/ r5t4Y6MVteYeBFp/ml/Vlydipy/lZFr0lBEcsgeqSy+WwtNqyt2wa2FhiHFB89B/ eBPca4NtghVGZJw4Fdgdn3+1khgPcMSp6SER1xGuML/Eg1uXnn/Ic/1h4tz0qxIM wJHzN7NjPlQbAT91yuzRbE41mV0EXKDxfTaEyTdzoyCXT+Htx/anODUKbMiwpfuQ L72oRUVwMUOADuAtt9Ar3on8qyvRcJRjQWW45lF4bCa8CBzBcgw= =XkSs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qu4vzv4jzzbsmmw6--