From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 28 10:32: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E7E37B422; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:31:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA56929; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:31:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200105281731.KAA56929@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: 'make includes' ownership patch In-Reply-To: <20010528102611.B16715@dragon.nuxi.com> from "David O'Brien" at "May 28, 2001 10:26:11 am" To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:31:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ru@FreeBSD.ORG (Ruslan Ermilov), kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being > > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile. > > > > And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them... > > it was an experiment, a sample test designed to only be used in -current > > /usr/src/lib, that BDE, Sheldon and myself had long followon conversations > > about, and got dropped into the cracks. > > What was the reasoning for a serperate owner specification from BIN*? Simple orthagonality. Ie, each bsd.*.mk file typically has a seperate set of *{DIR/OWN/GRP/MODE} specs. bsd.inc.mk was cloned from another bsd.*.mk file. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message