From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 4 22:46:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F64106564A for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 22:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B88FC08 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 22:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so4811350pbb.13 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sBFpWPVqFb/9/KE/YtunyzwDJcnNO7lJzEx+aa77x5w=; b=ldUqqxR1Iycocjc4tboKR+AfBpnc/OgnRB5fSSDeeVxydHMQA0oU3EMngNdGIkI2YZ 4dOxM8sSKCOwb+kWefmgZZcL/EJgZZZdYNe6K3mqylurH51rWhGhtuehLcrdP+c3NMuH 1tRXaDq/KRAWLob7+fNm1Inje9C3MA1lj0FYh3Fkt8zypPOo0pD2TtKl+0NogzndHZtp 0sJrRAEI4fY06RjZT+Hg9e3Nr3sA9kf5+crG4Wyz8u2bqtJHOulkR+KEglLvHlJ3/8hY YEEgxWMokKNpDIW1HZ5cYF6vwqkz6uyqrUyksjqgca9psr1sv7526wUErUZWluAGSACz RU9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.224.167 with SMTP id rd7mr22972757pbc.129.1336171583417; Fri, 04 May 2012 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.101.9 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2012 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 15:46:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rLor317pyQ90oGTqn3nJOaTidlo Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Patrick Kelsey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC/SD SPI-mode driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 22:46:29 -0000 Hi! I'll first take a stab at the ar71xx SPI code. You've introduced bus grab/release routines, do other consumers of the SPI API need to be 'fixed' ? (eg mx25l) ? I'd like to get at least this update into the tree so you can do your variable speed SPI device IO for supporting MMC devices. Thanks! Adrian