Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:04:18 +0800 From: "Li-Lun Wang (Leland Wang)" <llwang@infor.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: PORTVERSION for a port that depends on the another software Message-ID: <20050419030418.GA25934@Athena.infor.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a port (www/ump) that depends on another port (audio/timidity++). Whenever there is a new version of timidity++ ump needs to be rebuilt. I had been using PORTREVISION to do this---whenever there is a new version of timidity++, I bump the PORTREVISION of ump, which I found quite stupid. I am thinking if it is a good idea to concatenate the version numbers of both ports to form the PORTVERSION. For example, the current version of ump is 1.10, and the current version of timidity++ is 2.13.2, can I make the PORTVERSION of ump 1.10.2.13.2? What do you think? - -- Leland Wang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCZHUwCQM7t5B2mhARAiqpAJ9bxe1gp4PcWAQZ/ce0PU8mI0jUvgCfbk0H 18Z0io3z1/g4atVNCt6FJ6Q= =uOcZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050419030418.GA25934>