From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 10 00:14:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5AF16A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE2443D46
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AD51A3C29;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 16:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1ACA2513A2; Wed,  9 Nov 2005 19:14:43 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:14:42 -0500
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Ian Lord <mailing-lists@msdi.ca>
Message-ID: <20051110001442.GA28042@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost>
	<20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<6.2.3.4.2.20051109190705.048069a0@pop.msdi.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109190705.048069a0@pop.msdi.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:44 -0000


--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:08:12PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:
> Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
>=20
> I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was "clear" ULE was=20
> a better alternative for performance then 4BSD

Yes, in the workloads I have tested.  Others have reported similar
things.

You should carefully measure it yourself on your workloads to verify
which is better.

Kris

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDcpDyWry0BWjoQKURAuNJAJ9L0PkuB8UIRfZ1zRGhtpASvY9H+wCg+Cc+
w4/hw/t0Ts09krWOo73UZrc=
=De91
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--