From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug 19 03:15:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA25798
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 03:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca17-23.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.183])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA25793
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 03:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id DAA20187; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 03:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 03:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: itojun@itojun.org
CC: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <639.871826920@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp>
Subject: Re: another make world compile problem, the previous is fixed
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * 	I'm not familiar with /usr/src/usr.bin/vi policy, but...
 * 	is it really necessery to compile in tcl interpreter into
 * 	/usr/bin/vi?
 * 	(I'm familiar with nvi itself)

IMO, no (regardless of NOTCL setting).  If people want a bloated vi
with tcl/tk/perl/whatever support built in, they can use the ports.

Satoshi