From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 12 19:44:23 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D1816A4DD;
	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2099943D45;
	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:44:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7CJiMBV076614;
	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:44:22 GMT
	(envelope-from remko@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from remko@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id k7CJiMXR076613;
	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:44:22 GMT (envelope-from remko)
Message-Id: <200608121944.k7CJiMXR076613@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:44:22 +0000 (UTC)
To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Cc: 
Subject: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:44:23 -0000

remko       2006-08-12 19:44:22 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository (doc committer)

  Modified files:
    security/vuxml       vuln.xml 
  Log:
  OK after some more discussions with Simon it appeared that the ,2
  marked all future releases of squirrelmail as vulnerable.
  
  The negative side-effect of PORTEPOCH.  Split the previous entry
  into two seperated entries again, restoring the old entry for
  squirrelmail, and having the 'new' entry for ja-squirrelmail.
  
  This would grab any future versions of ja-squirrelmail if it were
  to be readded, and does not conflict with future versions of
  squirrelmail.
  
  For more information about the portepoch discussion etc:
  http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-vuxml/2006-July/000185.html
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.1104    +5 -2      ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml