From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 02:41:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CCC16A417 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@sequestered.net) Received: from kwisatz.haderach.net (kwisatz.haderach.net [208.116.11.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D49D13C48D for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@sequestered.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: macbook@sequestered.net) with ESMTP id 788AB2882A for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <472153A1.4090301@sequestered.net> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:40:33 -0700 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200710232143.14412.freysman@comcast.net> <471EF178.5050600@FreeBSD.org> <4720FD15.4000905@sequestered.net> <47210F08.3060403@FreeBSD.org> <4721349D.9050505@i19.se> <472135A3.2000809@sequestered.net> <20071026022013.06da2474@gumby.homeunix.com.> <472149E5.5070209@sequestered.net> <20071026031924.38affb9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071026031924.38affb9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 7.0 and 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:41:47 -0000 RW wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:59:01 -0700 > Jay Chandler wrote: > >> RW wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700 >>> Jay Chandler wrote: >>> >>>> Johan Andersson wrote: >>>>> On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>>> Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you recommend? >>>> portupgrade -afO >>>> >>> Personally I prefer >>> >>> portupgrade -f '<2007-10-25 11:00' >>> >>> since it's restartable. >> You don't have to throw the -O flag in there to keep various ports >> from complaining? > > > The point of -O is to have portupgrade save a few seconds by omitting > sanity-checking if pkgdb has already been run. It's not intended > for hiding problems. Okay, I'll buy that. I just tried it, and it worked. I distinctly remember a port (mailscanner-mrtg, but there are others) who choked on the fact that Apache1.3 isn't the same thing as Apache2.2 until I fed it the O flag... -- Jay Chandler / KB1JWQ Living Legend / Systems Exorcist Today's Excuse: Melting hard drives