From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 04:57:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B524B37B401 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32E443FB1 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:57:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53BvQMD010482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:57:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id h53BvLF47305; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:57:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16092.36129.388194.477452@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:57:21 -0400 (EDT) To: Mike Makonnen In-Reply-To: <20030603115432.EGLB13328.out002.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> References: <20030603113927.I71313@cvs.imp.ch> <16092.35144.948752.554975@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030603115432.EGLB13328.out002.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 11:57:28 -0000 Mike Makonnen writes: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:40:56 -0400 (EDT) > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > > Webservers and all other applications which run shell scripts exec a > > shell to interpret that script. Regardless of how the parent is > > linked, if the exec'ed shell is dynamically linked, there is an added > > cost to exec'ing it. > > and these are usually perl, php, or compiled cgi programs, not /bin/sh. > Ok, maybe a webserver is a bad example. But you must admit that /bin/sh is commonly used outside the startup scripts. Drew