From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 15:43:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8D016A4CE; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:43:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [83.167.185.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B65143D2D; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE0C65218; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:43:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02710-03-7; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:43:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (dhcp52.icir.org [192.150.187.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21596651EE; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:43:25 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 833D462DB; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:43:52 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20050418154352.GB756@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> <86ll7i30mc.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050416211000.GF784@empiric.icir.org> <20050418094356.O1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050418094356.O1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:43:59 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > Which? I've begun designing ng_pppoa. I haven't written a Netgraph node before, so that should be interesting. > NATM is NOT part of HARP. We can safely remove HARP without touching NATM. > But someone needs to sit down and fix NATM to be MPSAFE. rwatson has been volunteering to do this, I've offered to test with real hardware. I am about to move continents again so my level of disruption is likely to be high. BMS