From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Sep 5 5: 0: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D311F37B422 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id FAA01637; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200009051200.FAA01637@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/20993: many ftpd commands not limited to logins Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/20993; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/20993: many ftpd commands not limited to logins Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 13:56:20 +0200 On Tue, 05 Sep 2000 07:43:21 -0400, "Chris D. Faulhaber" wrote: > > This would need to spend a _long_ time in CURRENT before being merged > > into RELENG_4. > > > > Ummm, ok. The changes are quite trivial, though. The deltas are small and simple, but the potential impact is not trivial. How much time have you spent investigating what this will do to various software packages that rely on the current behaviour? I realize that several other FTP daemons behave as you propose that ours should. I just don't think that we should rush the merge into STABLE, especially since this doesn't seem to fix any glaring security holes. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message