From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 11 22:13:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B55A1065675 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aragon@phat.za.net) Received: from mail.geek.sh (decoder.geek.sh [196.36.198.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45988FC12 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aragon@phat.za.net) Received: from igor.geek.sh (unknown [196.209.244.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.geek.sh (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62BD93988A; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:13:28 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <4A590E7F.8000208@phat.za.net> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:13:19 +0200 From: Aragon Gouveia User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090331) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru References: <20090710042106.GC31950@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> <20090710071023.GB32316@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> <20090710112631.GE32316@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> <3a142e750907100433y307f9b2bya1dc54953bdf5de2@mail.gmail.com> <0B1F6799-2FAC-4C01-A978-42E247979CAB@mac.com> <1z5niluEh3OBPNSdMbOMyoEwzX4@CWODRlDR5RMqbkBfR0/UzHcfNhE> <267A655F-13A6-4D79-A933-3A78854AC5FD@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , John Marshall , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-BETA1 bsdlabel broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:13:31 -0000 Hi, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Please, try the attached patch -- it should heal bsdlabel and it will > show/use the proper offsets everywhere. Works fine for me -- offsets > for 7.x and 8.x are the same. I've seen the reported problem on my BETA1 systems too. I've also noticed this in my bootup dmesg: GEOM: ad4s2: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). These systems were partitioned and installed using BETA1's sysinstall. Out of curiosity I repartitioned and reinstalled fresh from a 7.2-RELEASE CD. No GEOM warning, and bsdlabel didn't complain. I extracted the 8.0-BETA1 kernel from CD and booted that in single user mode. The GEOM warning above didn't occur, but (7.2's) bsdlabel complained in the same way. Is it possible sysinstall is a culprit in all this? Thanks, Aragon