Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:36:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220561] [NEW PORT] security/vuls-cve-dictionary: Local CVE database Message-ID: <bug-220561-13-M5oeIV1LvD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220561-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220561-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220561 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(iscand | |r@gmail.com) Summary|New port: |[NEW PORT] |security/vuls-cve-dictionar |security/vuls-cve-dictionar |y Local CVE database |y: Local CVE database Keywords| |feature, needs-patch, | |needs-qa CC| |iscandr@gmail.com Status|New |Open --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Thank you for your contribution Alexandru. Please: * Confirm this change passes QA (portlint and poudriere in particular). For more information on testing, see: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing.= html * Include the addition of the port to category/Makefile (since it was submi= tted as a diff) * Combine all changes into a single unified diff, rather than one diff per file. * Consider renaming vuls-cve-dictionary to go-cve-dictionary. I could not f= ind (google) references to a more canonical upstream name than the name of the project (github repository) and none for vuls-cve-dictionary. * Consider trimming COMMENT (portlint should pick this up) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220561-13-M5oeIV1LvD>