From nobody Wed Mar 25 14:51:44 2026 X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fgqcd33Qzz6WNMZ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fgqcd16Tfz43VQ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1774450321; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9zl8eOeQD7geDKYFKxnttBwPO1aXumPLUOPWO8AQHbg=; b=X9pxQmdnz4mmxb22k7mXzmDL6refMdX3RV1HdTRyhin+iPxQX5Spi39jFiQ7Yq5BSNqDVU 5oi4IBm3x51CwNkX09Op68v6/kNIzWbe4b/nfDZDbMJG4VxfMItni0S6Bc10Wf5T7iwz8d NIQ76Etn/L+fQWFLVim7/hWWjrpyDbWaVuXkCYpU6oNyOwYkofoUzcnhP7+H2QhWiZoR0h ZJ/MPZMzFN2d2mpmt6UNq9izdsY67EzxEK9drMqhjNtHE+5sknW4V37m5pYECE8r1qDDUo 4mAgqJsmtDNBM1Jrsa6H0WVCfgEHjj01nfdOMghtotz87gI81gngAVX/2kJ+ww== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1774450321; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EYg2bbmQJ+ic7p9zN2Rll7g7fAJwUo6FAdr9dNxTmBzFAipnfwG73FrTT3skoVrkMt9yGj Bv5oE6HVkIyXnAvFQr9m73+HfwdC3uY4tWlaHEc/GofMxEVMJEFYDFn5cikwzlZJ+g1xQj Fr0uUVlVqElQW+SzYlbWgruYlbUc1snPJIRB/t+YB3f/AHbg5qKTIJaznyVn+oWc53Yrg9 C9Mrct2w8R19S+mLyK1DGFStOsm0nPJO1Ycuag9aqhn9/djV+iOw3JMmqPOeYMhtbzbWMc fmTt9CzAhZYz3NLBz6iioHvZQoO/mJCPvcK5AV3VVhI8UIhBsK5SWGAmSu5R5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1774450321; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9zl8eOeQD7geDKYFKxnttBwPO1aXumPLUOPWO8AQHbg=; b=PMm9HWqJU553xFDubCaoRMNgsKbroz8TjMqBVbbUAtSgMBFmHRoT/p/GrD+0PhBEMFnYlR Y1pH2o1ysZv/xnrJJKKLBRv9NGOPqvBacFHJ8VD4iFidCLp9eVg13tNG/8qXvlNJ+FXL/Y fI0czNI+VTpXB0zzP51B9EXyu/obQmSSXS7f93Q3MR11hx4Sv0qYpeNzgcPx2lY//gGUvI zKoOy4MmTUY7KBTHV+pb4w87ip9MREV+RD1yaiJ0iyRwccsJCCmH4+Yz2yis8NrK9FISTN 8sO+pyXdIeIfp5u38DS81o26R+jnL4ljV86dzalbsXMa9OsN+dCD8PyRu02f+w== Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4fgqcc5Cjrzt2T; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:51:44 +0000 From: Lexi Winter To: hackers@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: more pkgbase reviewers required Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: hackers@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org References: <3536ba2d-ada0-4ebe-8e20-da94c9bc6fea@nomadlogic.org> List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qjJx/Cv96oU2VK7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3536ba2d-ada0-4ebe-8e20-da94c9bc6fea@nomadlogic.org> --qjJx/Cv96oU2VK7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pete Wright wrote in <3536ba2d-ada0-4ebe-8e20-da94c9bc6fea@nomadlogic.org>: > On 3/25/26 05:54, Lexi Winter wrote: > > at this point, it's extremely difficult to get any pkgbase-related > > changes reviewed in Phabricator, which is an issue since we're now > > pushing pkgbase as the default method for installing the system. > > [...] > > do you need to have a commit bit to be a useful reviewer. no. although... i will say i tend to give more attention to reviews =66rom other committers. but it's not a requirement to be a committer to review a change, and it's very helpful to get feedback from testing (e.g., "this change broke my system!"), or to know that a particular change might break existing deployments, for example. but when considering whether to land a change, i only look at reviews =66rom committers. i.e., i might *not* land a change if non-committers have objections, but i will not land a change if the only reviews are =66rom non-committers. does that make sense? basically what i'm saying is, yes, it's useful to get feedback on changes from people who aren't committers, but we still need committers to actually land changes. --qjJx/Cv96oU2VK7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCacP2fAAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YOSeAPwJUIeL7VSOqt93vqyChnPhik8Cmitz8Lzz6HxICiNLpgEA/on8Pit4w+TW 2pGYhIHGXZcTjf9M9u0eTzuT1mnZDwE= =C+dO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qjJx/Cv96oU2VK7Z--