From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 13 14:55:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3862716A4C0 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38A0743FB1 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:55:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 91441 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Sep 2003 21:55:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.5?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 13 Sep 2003 21:55:49 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:57:25 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <20030913141509.L85817@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> Message-ID: <20030913155419.R97191@pooker.samsco.home> References: <200309131835.h8DIZ1gG045234@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030913133814.D97191@pooker.samsco.home> <20030913141509.L85817@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/forth beastie.4th X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:55:53 -0000 On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Put beastie_disable="YES" in /boot/loader.conf. > > > > > installworld steers clear > > > of updating this file, so it should be safe from changes. > > > > > This is likely to change. > > If it does, may I suggest that this happens in /usr/src/etc/Makefile > instead of in installworld? That way mergemaster can deal with it. > > In an ideal world, anything in loader.conf should be twiddle'able in > loader.conf.local, but if it isn't, we don't want to blat user changes. > > Doug > For a bit of historical perspective, many people have quite clearly expressed their opinion on the beastie bootloader to me in no uncertain terms. For those people, the only appropriate solution seems to be to remove all traces of this functionality, something that is quite easy to do by doing what I suggested to DES. Scott