From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 16 23:54:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B5037B408; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 23:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0214.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.214] helo=mindspring.com) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17JqPN-0001qM-00; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 23:54:37 -0700 Message-ID: <3D0D8788.D668B2C0@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 23:54:00 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans Cc: Maxime Henrion , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build References: <20020617150426.W3371-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bruce Evans wrote: > > Where is this crap, and how to turn it off, spelled out, other > > than the source code? I didn't see it in the .info; maybe I'm > > just looking in the wrong place? > > Restrictions on C compilers are specified in C standards. The standards > mostly try to not restrict the compiler. So it "just assumes printf and puts use the same underlying implementation in the C library", and doesn't document its assumptions anywhere? I think I'm going to be sick. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message