From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 05:38:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98721065670 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB148FC18 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 29766 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2008 00:38:29 -0500 Received: from 124-171-253-152.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ayiin) (124.171.253.152) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Apr 2008 00:38:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:38:23 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080428153823.61710f84@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <9b09889b0804271944l24f9d7a8v240017ac401bd828@mail.gmail.com> References: <05B6619C-9771-41EA-B43E-05DB40CB3258@lafn.org> <9b09889b0804271944l24f9d7a8v240017ac401bd828@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Firewalls X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:38:30 -0000 On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:44:35 -0500 "Eric Humphries" wrote: > PF supports traffic shaping via ALTQ. I've been meaning to try this. does it support 'pipes' in the same sense as ipfw ? if so, it seems another reason use ipfw is gone... B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "With COBOL, the job description of 'computer programmer' will be a thing of the past. Everybody will program. The boss will dictate a program to his secretary, who will keypunch it for him." 1960's quote about the upcoming COBOL language (thx. Lance N!) I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.