From owner-freebsd-security Tue May 15 6:19:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from kottan-labs.bgsu.edu (kottan-labs.bgsu.edu [129.1.133.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50F137B422 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:19:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from memphis_ms@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 1482 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 09:21:50 -0400 Received: from m133-122.bgsu.edu (HELO gmx.net) (129.1.133.122) by kottan-labs.bgsu.edu with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 15 May 2001 09:21:50 -0400 Message-ID: <3B012DB2.DF11CF12@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:22:58 -0400 From: Raoul Schroeder X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Szilveszter Adam Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Warnings while compiling Samba References: <3AFFE661.5D6015EA@comune.arzignano.vi.it> <20010514162605.C3213@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > This warning is always triggered if the linker encounters this function > name since often it is used unsafely and since FreeBSD provides a better > alternative. But this is for the programmer/porter who might consider if he > better swap mktemp() to mkstemp() or not. Unfortunately, it is not as easy > as switching the two words... so I do not think you should be very > concerned about this. Hmm, actually, with Samba-TNG, I really did just switched the functions to mkstemp() and it worked fine. I cannot guarantuee anything though. Just personal experience.. Raoul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message