From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 06:27:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE8E16A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:27:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5556F43D39 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:27:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (#6@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2GERR0R058377 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:27:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Message-Id: <200403161427.i2GERR0R058377@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Organization: Serendipity Scheduling & Management X-Image-URL: http://www.transsys.com/louie/images/louie-mail.jpg From: "Louis A. Mamakos" References: <255A839665EA24408EB27A6AAE15518EAC1B@europa.ad.hartbrothers.com> In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:55:57 GMT." <255A839665EA24408EB27A6AAE15518EAC1B@europa.ad.hartbrothers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:27:27 -0500 Sender: louie@TransSys.COM Subject: Re: ftp.perl.org strangeness X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:27:28 -0000 Wouldn't it be nice to be able to configure the default behavior of the resolver to not query AAAA records first, before looking for A records? Just because my host is capable of doing IPv6 doesn't mean I prefer using it over IPv4. Especially since it's almost certain to be a lower performance path traversing various tunnels, with smaller MTUs, etc. This capabilty would be a work-around to this problem, but it would be useful in it's own right, and might actually encourage people to turn on IPv6 since it would be less likely to have an impact on their existing applications. louie