From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 7 16:43:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8636916A404; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu) Received: from citi.umich.edu (citi.umich.edu [141.211.133.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DA13C4BA; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu) Received: from citi.umich.edu (dsl093-001-248.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.1.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by citi.umich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4466138DB9; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:10:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:10:45 -0500 From: Jim Rees To: Wilko Bulte Message-ID: <20070407161044.GA24875@citi.umich.edu> References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <46177881.3090509@wcborstel.com> <20070407141736.GC4058@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070407141736.GC4058@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:09:21 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, Jorn Argelo , Pawel Jakub Dawidek , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:43:45 -0000 Wilko Bulte wrote: My guess(!) is that they do not want non-GPL-ed code in the standard kernel. Actually there is non-GPL code in linux, NFSv4 for example. Some licenses are considered "incompatible." OpenAFS falls into this category, apparently because of some problem with patents. I don't know what the situation is with CDDL.