Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:17:49 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> Cc: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es>, "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ATI radeon 3450 with new xorg Message-ID: <CAN6yY1sA5=w20bM4tEMG6WA7Yghx%2B6mAUhic=_hUd5wWvMU4FA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1587561.EWNipSh9BT@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> References: <20140730140133.52e2b326991439497eef6067@fbsd.es> <DEAA56C6-D961-4146-BE50-0AD2944BA27C@FreeBSD.org> <CAN6yY1uSS4MUheiFJogn1EbviHGibTqV_E3M5iB3FT1VSSR0cw@mail.gmail.com> <1587561.EWNipSh9BT@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:31:05 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On 30 Jul 2014, at 19:30, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:36 +0300 > > > > Arto Pekkanen <isoa@kapsi.fi> wrote: > > > >> Is there a chance this patch would be MFC'd? > > > > > > I'm not sure how the branching works with ports, but this would > probably > > > be a good candidate for merging to whatever the latest "stable" branch > > > is. > > > > > > > > > > His patch fixes my problem, but I don't know if Dimitry is waiting > for > > > more opinions favourable before commit it. > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > Thanks for testing, it is good to know that it works on real hardware! > > > I have only been able to test it on a virtualized environment myself... > > > > > > In any case, I am not a ports committer, so the maintainer(s) should > > > commit it, or give their approval for me to do so. > > > > > > -Dimitry > > > > > > Dimitry and Carlos, > > > > Ports don't branch. They are only tagged at the points of FreeBSD > releases, > > so all commits are to head. As a result, the term MFC is not appropriate. > > oh, they do: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2014Q3/ > and MFC (MFH) is appropriate. > Thanks for the correction.I had assumed that quarterlies were just tags. So MFH is a valid thing, though it is not clear to me how often it is desirable to do so. This looks a like a good candidate, though thee may be reasons that x11@ sees that I don't. (Also, I don't currently use any Radeons.) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1sA5=w20bM4tEMG6WA7Yghx%2B6mAUhic=_hUd5wWvMU4FA>