From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  5 18:42:08 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D01106568B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Oct 2009 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-yx0-f184.google.com (mail-yx0-f184.google.com
	[209.85.210.184])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974E18FC16
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Oct 2009 18:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yxe14 with SMTP id 14so4226867yxe.7
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=f7TF4NPbiPtHTqcm6tjaVIhM39TB6totroU4ftcGr1U=;
	b=TLBs6FlOYRnBjMziwj6PGw47UL3kmixipPjeWl8TY1ZoAWfUmD+1uuj51tvuQe7ynp
	b7FovQydDs1iWlvXMJQdr3wszikbcQz0KRgeQTflK6A541AcY65HhDmgpRpoAb3TDmmv
	qWpgNV4Y/ZPlCXSDsi2zzMWSaVbiYoWYFysCQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=J81eOpR3K1C/szqXY6/H+TFOm3M0MMcByxIVm5pKvTtjqWe4hehuQGpMcgIhTxGp91
	tzbzxzMwaDEcnDeNpSRfh93aKiWZBUPuHNdzlE08UQWGJ/hjnkdJMhrHLMegozCRJvRl
	vpNEKgfY2EjWBo9kHv9VTeEVbfpaTj9hYmEzw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.238.1 with SMTP id l1mr604205ybh.68.1254768126907; Mon, 05 
	Oct 2009 11:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4ACA3146.9090402@tomjudge.com>
References: <4ACA0549.7030404@tomjudge.com> <4ACA2E0F.5010800@elischer.org>
	<4ACA3146.9090402@tomjudge.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:42:06 -0500
Message-ID: <6201873e0910051142q58e7563fqc7735261ea9ab3c6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject: Re: Per Jail Memory Limits
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:42:08 -0000

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> wrote:

> Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> Tom Judge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know of a patch that will add per jail memory limits so that
>>> a jail can't swallow the resources of the entire box?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Tom
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>>
>>
>>
>> not yet..
>>
>>
> I started to port this to 7.1 today:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits
>
>
> What are the peoples opinions on this patch?
>
>
> Tom
>

If you're soliciting opinions if this will be used and is needed, I would
love to see this functionality.  This is the main reason I've had to chose
XEN over jails.  If you need some help testing, let me know.

-- 
Adam Vande More