From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 16 17:11:48 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C61E1065688
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:11:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eculp@casasponti.net)
Received: from ns2.bafirst.com (72-12-2-19.static.networktel.net [72.12.2.19])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991978FC20
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eculp@casasponti.net)
Received: from casasponti.net ([201.155.7.3])
	by ns2.bafirst.com with esmtp; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:11:41 -0500
	id 000D52E8.48F775CF.000020AE
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80)
	by casasponti.net with local; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:11:07 -0500
	id 00130CED.48F775AB.00010AAA
Received: from dsl-189-190-8-164.prod-infinitum.com.mx
	(dsl-189-190-8-164.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.190.8.164]) by
	intranet.casasponti.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008
	12:11:07 -0500
Message-ID: <20081016121107.17qwm4xcs6kgwg884@intranet.casasponti.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:11:07 -0500
From: eculp@casasponti.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <20081016090102.17qwm4xcs6f4so8ok@intranet.casasponti.net>
	<20081016145255.GA12638@icarus.home.lan>
	<48F75A88.1000507@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0810160846040.473@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0810160846040.473@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (5.0-cvs)
X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17)
	Gecko/20080925 Firefox/2.0.0.17
X-IMP-Server: 201.155.7.3
X-Originating-IP: 189.190.8.164
X-Originating-User: eculp@casasponti.net
Subject: Re: I've just found a new and interesting spam source - legitimate
	bounce messages
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:11:48 -0000

Luke Dean <LukeD@pobox.com> escribi=F3:

>
>
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Until the wonderful day that the entire internet abides by these =20
>> rules[*], use
>> of technologies like SPF and DKIM can discourage but not entirely =20
>> prevent the
>> spammers from joe-jobbing you.
>
> I just started getting these bouncebacks en masse this week.
> My mail provider publishes SPF records.
> If the names and numbers in the bouceback messages are to be =20
> believed, however, the spammers have defeated SPF by hijacking DNS.  =20
> The poor recipients never see my SPF records because they're looking =20
> at the wrong IP address.

Thanks, Matthew.  I guess that is the root problem of spf, the =20
spammers, that it is supposed to stop.  It looks a bit like our =20
economy, a loosing battle.

It really make me feel impotent this morning.

Have a great day,

ed