From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 27 19:50:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AF06016A4CE; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:50:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7400843D45; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:50:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bms@spc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 74B6A65339; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:50:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 77178-03-4; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:50:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (c-24-7-102-181.client.comcast.net
	[24.7.102.181])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9FDDF6530A; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:50:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7CC8F6246; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:50:29 -0700
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20041027195029.GB770@empiric.icir.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
References: <200410260331.i9Q3Vxbv060994@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20041026034126.GI706@empiric.icir.org> <20041027191233.GF44427@cell.sick.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041027191233.GF44427@cell.sick.ru>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet if_ether.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:50:40 -0000

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:12:33PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> If we are interested in tracking this down, we should add a printf,
> so that people who hit this will notce it and report.
> Otherwise this problem will  be left forever in a workaround state.

That's what revision 1.109 was for, but I have only had 2 reports of this.

Once the ARP rewrite is finished, and ARP is finally separated from the
routing table, we will probably not see this any more.

My theory right now is that a sockaddr_dl is being interpreted as a
link-layer address when actually only the sdl_index field needs to be
interpreted.

BMS