From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Apr  2  9:13:11 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from frolkin.demon.co.uk (frolkin.demon.co.uk [194.222.100.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D6137B565
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Apr 2000 09:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sasha@frolkin.demon.co.uk)
Received: from sasha by frolkin.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 12bm64-0000CW-00; Sun, 02 Apr 2000 16:15:28 +0100
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 16:15:27 +0100
From: Alexander Frolkin <alexander@frolkin.demon.co.uk>
To: James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Building 4.x on 3.x
Message-ID: <20000402161527.A583@gamma>
Reply-To: Alexander Frolkin <alexander@frolkin.demon.co.uk>
References: <38E69E73.4CFF971C@thehousleys.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i
In-Reply-To: <38E69E73.4CFF971C@thehousleys.net>; from James Housley on Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 08:12:19PM -0500
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.14
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 08:12:19PM -0500, James Housley wrote:
> I got an old pentium 100 laptop that I want to play around with 4.x on. 
> It's disk to too small to hold the source tree, obj tree and useful
> programs.  Is it okay to do the buildworld on my 3.4-Stable server with
> more memory, speed, disk, etc....  Then nfs mount the src & obj trees to
> do the install world and build kernel??

I built 4.0 on a 3.4 system yesterday, and it worked fine. I also built the
4.0 kernel (using make buildkernel) on the 3.4 system.


Alexander.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message