From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jun 24 17:35:30 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA16722
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA16717
          for <FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id RAA14710; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706250034.RAA14710@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
CC: FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <19970625012852.DC01269@uriah.heep.sax.de> (j@uriah.heep.sax.de)
Subject: Re: tcl
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Are the different versions really still necessary?  We don't even have
 * a default /usr/local/bin/wish in one of the ports.  Makes it fairly
 * difficult to write #!/usr/local/bin/wish<what's the version today>
 * scripts that are portable across systems.

That is bad.  There should be a symlink to the default version (4.1
today) of wish.

Satoshi