From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 18 14:34:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA05190 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05173 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA24797; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:29:51 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:29:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199704182129.PAA24797@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Terry Lambert Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), dennis@etinc.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...) In-Reply-To: <199704182117.OAA02823@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199704181522.JAA21382@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199704182117.OAA02823@phaeton.artisoft.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.27 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The commercial organizations I've dealt with (and in) must schedule > for "minimal feature set", "expected feature set", and then "stretch > goals" over and above that. Then the organizations you dealt with are *very* different than the organizations I've dealt with. I've found that the FreeBSD 'release engineering/software engineering' cycle is orders of magnitudes better than REAL (tm) companies I've worked for and with. > If they told you it was supposed to be fixed in the next product, and > then it wasn't, you'd scream blue murder. Happens more often than not in my experience. The behavior of the bug has changed, but the bug still exists. Nate