From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 11:47:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFE316A47C for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5221443D60 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:47:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.141] (helo=anti-virus02-08) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GQ0Xw-0004m6-GA; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:47:20 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GQ0Ve-0005jH-Oe; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:44:58 +0100 Message-ID: <451129BA.6000402@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:44:58 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan References: <451123D8.7090007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <451123D8.7090007@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: amd ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:47:27 -0000 eoghan wrote: > Hi > Just a general question about the ports for freebsd. I am now running > 6.1 on amd64. Got most of what I need, but noticed that some ports are > only i386 - like the flock browser and skype. Obviously I can live > without these but was just wondering if there is a place I could check > to see whether these would be available for amd in the future? http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ might have what you want. It's all the errors from building packages from ports. But it the port is specifically deprecated on amd64 it might not actually even try to build the package - not sure. For specific ports, I would suggest contacting the maintainer and asking them about amd64. You could also consider just running i386 version. The consensus seems to be that for desktop use the performance difference won't be much. Never found time to try amd64 and i386 works fine for me :-) --Alex