From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Apr 22 04:54:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA10557 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 04:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from axe.cablenet.net (axe.cablenet.net [194.154.36.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA10532 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 04:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from axe (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by axe.cablenet.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA00705; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:51:01 +0100 Message-ID: <335CA624.167EB0E7@cablenet.net> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:51:00 +0100 From: Damian Hamill Organization: CableNet Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.4 sun4m) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: danlaw@rust.net CC: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: News... References: <199704181657.JAA02594@root.com> <3357C27A.63DECDAD@cablenet.net> <3357F448.34A9@rust.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sysadmin wrote: > > Damian Hamill wrote: > > > > There just isn't enough bandwidth... ever... > True. As the internet evolves the customer will be using it and the > bandwidth they buy from you more completely. But will next month's > debate be over CU-Seeme (sp?), RealVideo, Push technology, or fully > utilized PPP connections caused by someone's new program to stop long > transfers during web browsing, so that http can still take place at > full speed as well? How to forbid, suppress, or eliminate such > advances in technology as menaces to ISP profits, and yet somehow be > able to present less services as "better service"? I didn't write this, I wrote the "isn't enough bandwidth... ever.." line. Please make sure you attribute the correct quotes to the correct people. regards damian -- * PIAB - PoP In A Box - the total solution for ISPs, with more features * than a Constable landscape, and very cheap too!! * http://www.cablenet.net/cablenet/popinabox/ * Damian Hamill damian@cablenet.net