From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 1 07:54:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76325C2047 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:54:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from mailhost.netlabit.sk (mailhost.netlabit.sk [84.245.65.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9wSB70Njz4rgX for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw3.dino.sk [84.245.95.254]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan) by mailhost.netlabit.sk with ESMTPA; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:54:16 +0200 id 00DD639F.60657C28.00004F5C Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:54:16 +0200 From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No update for a day on ports? Message-ID: <20210401095416.096f62c4@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20210401074704.7s6lqsqu6mnn2qwo@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <20210401082247.668e4394@zeta.dino.sk> <20210401091615.37e497fb@zeta.dino.sk> <20210401074704.7s6lqsqu6mnn2qwo@aching.in.mat.cc> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; i386-portbld-freebsd11.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F9wSB70Njz4rgX X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-ports@dino.sk designates 84.245.65.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-ports@dino.sk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[84.245.65.72:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dino.sk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[84.245.65.72:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5578, ipnet:84.245.64.0/18, country:SK]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:54:20 -0000 On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:47:04 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > Also, what about svn mirror, as is done for src repository, for 11 > > and 12 branches at least? I did not tried it recently, but it used > > to work. For some boxes, adding git to the mix would be big PITA. > > There will be no Git to Subversion conversion for ports, like for > docs. The only reason there is for the base system on 11 and 12 is > because Subversion was the source control software used when they > were released. > This is unpleasant move for me. This means git or equivalent (and dependencies) must be installed on any box where tracking ports tree is planned/needed... and no tool like svnlite could be expected in base system for some time. So I need some work on my local infrastructure to adjust to this move. C'est la vie... Regards, Milan