From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 15 8:39: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta02-svc.server.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0022B37B9DE for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:38:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from parish.my.domain ([62.253.89.11]) by mta02-svc.server.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20000615163825.SOGR10065.mta02-svc.server.ntlworld.com@parish.my.domain>; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:38:25 +0000 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish.my.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA02067; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:38:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:38:33 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= Cc: pirat@access.inet.co.th, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build wine fail Message-ID: <20000615163833.C239@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mikko@dynas.se on Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 03:47:02PM -0700 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 03:47:02PM -0700, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Mark Ovens wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 07:40:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > The only conclusion I can come to is that the good Wine folk (Winos?) > > > rolled a new tarball to fix the problem without changing the version > > > number, or rolled a new tarball to fix another problem and introduced > > > this one. Either way, mine is alright, so here are the details of the > > > tarball I have: > > > > > > parish# cd /usr/ports/distfiles > > > parish# ls -l Wine-20000526.tar.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4474012 27 May 00:35 Wine-20000526.tar.gz > > > parish# md5 !$ > > > md5 Wine-20000526.tar.gz > > > MD5 (Wine-20000526.tar.gz) = 50e1108263725091b98ddb2945d44f7a > > > parish# > > > > > Nope. I have the same one (same MD5), so there is something else that > is fishy. I'm running -STABLE as of May 25, with ports recently > updated. I'm running -STABLE, but a few weeks older, 6th May although I cvsup the source *and* ports trees several times a week. Maybe it's differences in /usr/ports/Mk/*mk files? One last thing I've done. I've tar'd up my /usr/ports/emulators/wine directory (after doing a ``make clean'' :)) and also my Mk/*mk files and put them at ftp://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/pub/mark/wine/wine.tgz and ftp://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/pub/mark/wine/mk_files.tgz might be worth diff'ing them against yours. HTH > > /Mikko > > Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com > RSA Security > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- If I buy a copy of WinDelete, and it doesn't delete Windows, am I entitled to my money back? ________________________________________________________________ FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/ mailto:mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message