From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 16:32:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BCA16A440 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:32:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: from phantombsd.org (dsl231-036-158.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.36.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53D243D48 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:32:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: by phantombsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 72D44102E64; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.phantombsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantombsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AAA102D22 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 199.181.134.212 (SquirrelMail authenticated user casey) by mail.phantombsd.org with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19069.199.181.134.212.1120667567.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:32:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Casey Scott" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on eagle.phantombsd.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 Subject: NIC suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:32:50 -0000 I am experiencing the same rebooting under network stress that others on this list have reported. The box is using 3com 905b's, and I would like to try another NIC in the box to make sure that this isn't just a driver issue, though I strongly suspect it isn't. Can someone suggest a common 100 MB NIC that has proven to be very stable in 5.x? Casey