Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 15:09:48 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports conflicts: `lib/libiberty.a' Message-ID: <3F89367C.7020109@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031012091953.GA872@chetwood.ru> References: <22159707417.20031010130423@serebryakov.spb.ru> <C9367B46-FC3D-11D7-8071-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> <20031012091953.GA872@chetwood.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergei Kolobov wrote: > On 2003-10-11 at 15:53 -0700, Ade Lovett wrote: > >>No. Please no. Oh lordy, no. The maze of options, variables, hacks, >>and other bits and pieces needs to be reduced, not increased. It's a >>staggeringly complex ball of wax already. > > > Agreed. Wasn't it you, Ade, who suggested going to something like: > > USE_FEATURES= autoconf automake openldap > > etc. Or at least this is what I remembered. ;) > I think this is the approach we should take and I am willing to help > with that unless you have the patches ready. ;) No, it was me. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=269861+273067+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-ports/20030824.freebsd-ports I stop from making a patch because of two points: 1) no comments :) 2) many knobs give not only port depends but some useful service too. And I didn't think over how to realize it. (May be with script like pkg-install/pkg-deinstall?). Anyway here is a place for public mind working :) -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F89367C.7020109>