From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 21 18:39: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E19137B479; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9M1cYA82994; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:38:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Cc: Hajimu UMEMOTO , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 In-Reply-To: Message from Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven of "Sat, 21 Oct 2000 21:02:22 +0200." <20001021210222.E40989@lucifer.bart.nl> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:38:33 -0700 Message-ID: <82990.972178713@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > However, Umemoto-san and me will discuss this, since we [he mostly] have > been working on this for the last few months. Sounds good to me. My comments were, just to make it clear again, just food for thought and not out-and-out objections. If even 47 more files in /etc is what it takes to get IPv6 fully supported, then so be it. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message