From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 25 16:18:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7E01065685 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFC68FC0A for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6PGITPD018618; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:18:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4984FBA8E; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:18:24 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Rene Ladan Message-ID: <20080725161824.GA28181@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080725082654.GA20013@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: optimal CPUTYPE / arch for Intel T5600 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:18:31 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:03:46PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > Hmm, according to CPU pages the T5600 is 64-bit capable (see > http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=3D29&threadid=3D206769= 5&enterthread=3Dy&STARTPAGE=3D2), > but according to the 7.0 hardware notes it is not: > ... >=20 > * Intel Pentium(R) 4 Processor supporting Intel EM64T ("Prescott"). > This is fabricated on 90nm process technology, uses FC-LGA775 package, > and operates with 3.20F/3.40F/3.60F GHz and Intel 925X Express > chipsets. The corresponding S-Spec numbers are SL7L9, SL7L8, SL7LA, > SL7NZ, SL7PZ, and SL7PX. Note that processors marked as 5xx numbers do > not support EM64T. > " >=20 > Yes, there are only two x's in the last sentence. Does that refer to > another processor type? Yes. The T5600 _does_ support x86_64/amd64/EM64T: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=3DSL9SP Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiJ/NAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyV5JQCfYS+07BIeMRfj3K+tsqn+zi6k vtYAnioarNqw3Y3dRvoKFm+Gv6tUtt9M =hteO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--