Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 22:30:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: change to linux/Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110142229170.9729-100000@beppo> In-Reply-To: <20011014221719.A528@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 09:00:11PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > The first problem was that there was no linux_syscall anyway. The second > > problem was that even when I regen'd them for -stable, the compile wasn't > > finding them. > > linux_syscall.h, linux_proto.h and linux_sysent.c will be generated on > the fly when you do a make depend. Did you do a make depend? Of course. They were not generated. They also, in fact, are checked in. > > > BTW- I'm not 100% convinced that similar problems are avoided in -current- by > > my having both a /usr/src on all of my machines as well as a /tstsys I > > probably get lots of unintentional 'sorta maybe kind mostly works' situations. > > On -current I reverted the generation-on-the-fly of the abovementioned > files, because we are missing the support in general for that. That's > probably why it works on -current. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0110142229170.9729-100000>