Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:39:07 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Harrison <ah54@httpsite.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Three Terabyte Message-ID: <XFMail.20030327123907.ah54@httpsite.com> In-Reply-To: <020401c2f486$d6d280f0$0a0114ac@home.bjwcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On 27-Mar-2003, Brent Wiese wrote message "RE: Three Terabyte" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Normally, I'd also agree with this. However, a friend of mine built a NAS > using the 3ware card and 11 200gb WD drives in a RAID5 config and can > sustain 85mbit/s *write* (the test was several hours long). I suspect it > would do even more with a gig-E card. > > Of course, that test would be fairly meaningless when you're doing something > like a mail spool, but it proves the application should drive the method. Yes, true. If capacity is more important, then obviously raid10 isn't the best choice. Let me know if that NAS needs a new home. ;) ~~ Andy Harrison ah##@httpsite.com ICQ: 123472 AIM/Y!: AHinMaine homepage: http://www.nachoz.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBPoM3OlPEkLgodAWVAQF87wQAhTFDrk44gnLTW9AbQ/WOp4wlFm3uE4Et ZXc2vidC2z0eNTU+ugSKUEhXr6up/hb1kdLIwwphR+/X6ygwbm3IfLGNzbsJQ2vj vwsKof9NiL4g3nphiHY3ecqSLjYJYpRK5OS51pL4gE26JUI1yD1U4IBA5F6WYuDN /BCpeZ2Nou8= =xMJ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030327123907.ah54>