From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 19 11:02:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F51216A43D; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail2out.barnet.com.au (mail2out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D4A43D45; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail2out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id ACE1F7074FF; Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:53 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <446DA5DD000048F18BB063@BarNet> Received: from mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (mail2.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.barnet.com.au", Issuer "*.barnet.com.au" (not verified)) by mail2.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E3A7074F7; Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:53 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [10.251.1.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D467074F1; Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:51 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E675D39B; Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:50 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:50 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org References: <200605190910.k4J9AthA057344@freefall.freebsd.org> <24823738@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519102325.GF1116@k7.mavetju> <58748084@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58748084@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/97488: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:02:56 -0000 On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:59:39PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2006 20:23:25 +1000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:25:25PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 May 2006 09:10:55 GMT Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > > > > > Synopsis: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 > > > > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-emulation > > > > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 19 09:10:54 UTC 2006 > > > > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > > > Over to maintainer > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97488 > > > > > > Shouldn't it be assigned to portmgr@?: > > > If the maintainer approves of it. > > Thanks for your answer, but some questions are left. > > I'm not sure who is treated as a maintainer. Isn't it netchild, who > filed this PR? Or am I not understanding the procedure? Is it needed > to be approved from the email address freebsd-emulation@? The ports Makefile says: the maintainers email address is freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org. Big problem here, that's not a real person. But how can a script know this? If I assign it to portmgr for a repocopy, I'll get the PR back in my lap when the repocopy is done, not netchild@. In the mean time (and sorry for the noise), netchild is old and wise enough to know how to assign this PR back to himself :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/