Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:22:34 +0200
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Subject:   Re: strange NAT behaviour
Message-ID:  <200407011722.42551.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040701143250.GA66234@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References:  <20040701135025.GA64383@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20040701143250.GA66234@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Boundary-02=_CxC5AlhmDhqC/54
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 01 July 2004 16:32, Divacky Roman wrote:
> I have booted -O universe and it works... so there is definitely some
> optimalization error - is it worth it to catch the bug? I'd say YES!

I agree.

> (isnt here even plan for officially supporting -O2?)

Well, you should provided some more specific explanation how you use this b=
ox.=20
i.e. how do you do NATting (ifpw + natd, ipf, pf or pppd's builtin)? What=20
interfaces do you employ? What is the MTU of your outgoing path? Moreover=20
tcpdumps are of interest in order to see why things do fail. Same for=20
statistics (netstat -ssp {ip, tcp, udp ...}) to learn why the packets are=20
being dropped.

> thnx for attention
>
> roman
>
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:50:25PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> > I have upgraded from CFLAGS=3D-O ARCH=3Dp2  may 17th current (both kern=
el
> > and userland) to CFLAGS=3D-Os (I know its NOT supported) ARCH=3Dathlon-=
xp
> > 30th June current and strange thing happend
> >
> > The machine in charge is working as a NAT and machines behind that are
> > not able to transfer any packet longer than 1472 bytes. its seems
> > fragmenting is broken but on that nat machine I am able to transfer
> > anything...
> >
> > I dont ask for help (since -Os is unsupported, but I am compiling -O
> > universe now so I might ask for help ;) ) just point it as interesting
> > behaviour... maybe some kind of bug?
> > and YES I have it all set properly
> >
> > roman

=2D-=20
Best regards,				| mlaier@freebsd.org
Max Laier				| ICQ #67774661
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/	| mlaier@EFnet

--Boundary-02=_CxC5AlhmDhqC/54
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBA5CxCXyyEoT62BG0RAoG8AJ9mQku0sS79Dru4wo7JqYZCv8NDhgCeNZw6
ihnkoJqq+4dvxfUIRE9lwFk=
=YNGG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_CxC5AlhmDhqC/54--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407011722.42551.max>