Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:25:51 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> To: paul@freebsd-services.co.uk Cc: Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca, Antoine.Beaupre@lmc.ericsson.se, alex@big.endian.de, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, richy@apple.com, libh@FreeBSD.ORG, will@physics.purdue.edu Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Message-ID: <20010620092551G.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <1049420000.993054113@lobster.originative.co.uk> References: <3B30CB02.2000700@lmc.ericsson.se> <1049420000.993054113@lobster.originative.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not touching that question with an 11 foot pole. :) I think it's simply too early to say yet. TCL is by far the least of libh's dependencies, and one might just as well ask the same question about Qt or TurboVision. It may be that by the time libh is ready to deploy, we'll have cracked the whole /usr/ports vs /usr/src modularity problem for all I know. - Jordan From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.co.uk> Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:21:53 +0100 > Is tcl going to become a standard part of the base OS when libh goes in? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010620092551G.jkh>