From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 17:17:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E645516A4CF for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 17:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AA3543D41 for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 17:17:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 37663 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2004 00:17:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Mike Silbersack In-Reply-To: <20040505183432.Y639@odysseus.silby.com> Message-ID: <20040505171634.N37631@root.org> References: <200405052004.i45K4EnF029671@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040505183432.Y639@odysseus.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdSynch.csrc/sys/i386/include acpica_machdep.h src/sys/ia64/include acpica_machdep.h src/sys/amd64/include acpica_machdep.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 00:17:44 -0000 On Wed, 5 May 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Wed, 5 May 2004, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > njl 2004/05/05 13:04:14 PDT > > > > Add an MI implementation of the ACPI global lock routines and retire the > > individual asm versions. The global lock is shared between the BIOS and > > OS and thus cannot use our mutexes. It is defined in section 5.2.9.1 of > > the ACPI specification. > > I don't know if it was this, or John's ELCR support, or what, but I tried > ACPI support again, and cbb0 (and subsequently wi0) now works for me! I'll be truthful and say John's changes are the likely hero. > Whoo! Now I can start experimenting with all the power saving features > and complain about those not working properly. :) Don't feel too obligated -- we have that role already quite full. :) -Nate