Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Jan 2016 04:10:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 206694] audio/audacity: Use different compiler to recognize optimizations, add lv2 support
Message-ID:  <bug-206694-13-qiSmXmrVHX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206694-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-206694-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206694

--- Comment #9 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to xxjack12xx from comment #8)

The root cause solution for the optimizations (requiring the patch), is for
upstream to make their configure script check for the presence of support f=
or
those flags:

standard checks (compile tests with -<flag>) or the following are options:

www.gnu.org/s/autoconf-archive/ax_check_compile_flag.html

I'd recommend leaving the patch in place until that occurs (at least report=
 the
issue) in favour of requiring users install another compilers.

Regarding the strip issue, check using the file(1) command to confirm wheth=
er
or not it's stripped (after install) to exclude an issue with stripped file
detection in the framework. If it isn't stripped, look to the audacity buil=
d to
figure out why.

At the present time the change as currently proposed is (IMO) not ready to
commit. Fixing the strip issue 'can' be deferred, but I recommend reverting=
 the
patch removal and compiler changes given the existing port version works now

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206694-13-qiSmXmrVHX>