From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jun 23 7:43:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (rdu26-228-058.nc.rr.com [66.26.228.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65BA37B406; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 07:43:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5NEhar07600; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:43:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:43:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Clarke To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Annihilator , , Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: pptpclient-1.0.2 In-Reply-To: <20010623165308.F497@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Message-ID: <20010623103826.Y7550-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am sure it works with pppd, but ever since mpd-netgraph, I have completely abandonded pptpclient. Persoanlly, I hated getting pppd to work when I always used Brian's ppp. I never compiled any ppp pseudo-devices in my kernel up until I needed pptpclient ;-). I would suggest if you're having problems with it, and you have a system that supports Netgraph, to move over to mpd-netgraph. It even comes with great examples for setting up both a PPTP server and client. Joe Clarke On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 10:51:09PM +0200, Annihilator wrote: > > Many people prefer kernel-ppp to the userland program. There are two > > things that you could do to make life easier for them: > > 1) Create two separate ports, or > > 2) Allow the user to choose at compile-time (if not run-time) which ppp > > should be used. > > (Disclaimer: I have never actually run or used pptpclient.) > > Are you certain that pptpclient even works with pppd under FreeBSD? > If it doesn't, and if it would require a lot of rewriting/patching > to work, then it would be likely done better by the authors themselves, > not as a FreeBSD port patch. > > Besides - are you really sure that 'many people prefer kernel-ppp'? > Almost every FreeBSD user *I* know about is perfectly happy with > the userland PPP implementation, which has many features, is constantly > developed, and is *very* well integrated with the overall FreeBSD-way > of doing things. Great job, Brian! > > G'luck, > Peter > > -- > What would this sentence be like if pi were 3? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message